During the parliamentary gun debates in the 90s, a police bord representative juxtaposed the right of a person to be safe vs. the privilege to own firearms. This is a total liberal mentality, to pretend the other side of the argument doesn't exist and ignore it. First the right to bear arms is a natural right that we have only allowed our governments to restrict. Second, due to the right of a citizen to be safe, they need to be able to defend themselves. Self defense is a right. The shooters are always armed and the victims are not. That needs to change.
|
Sunday, September 11, 2016
I don't think so Tim.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please don't censor me; I am trying to be honest and it is not my intention to offend anybody. If I have offended you personally, I ask you to accept my apologizes, forgive me, and consider not visiting my blog for my benefit.