It's everywhere now. Even though I'm not on Facebook and don't watch the news, I have heard, which makes me qualified to comment on the subject. We are making a lot of assumptions:
• The children were killed or died from abuse and,
• Abuse/malnutrition was uncommon in those times in any institution
• The graves were recient
• Unmarked graves were so because of hate or,
• Wooden crosses don't rot
• They were mass graves
• They were treated exceptionally hard by the standards of the day, orphanages were much better by comparison
• The Catholic Church was a business, not a charity helping when others would not, that had unlimited pockets
• Other institutions didn't have graveyards, like the Stratford Jail for example
• The value placed on human life wasn't less then
• Erasing the culture of Native people was the goal, not the result, of those schools
• Non-Native children wouldn't have been delinquent for truancy
• Those involved couldn't have had good intentions and,
• Those involved did not believe "if only we could educate everyone, we could end poverty and bring about equal opportunity"
• The media isn't fanning the flames for profit
• Nobody does what is politically expedient
• Everybody involved was evil
Every time I post, I think it is the most controversial thing I have ever written. This fits that hypothesis.
P.S. I wish I could find my Treatise on White Privilage or my rant on Feminism. Alas, lost on Facebook cyberspace, the are gone.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please don't censor me; I am trying to be honest and it is not my intention to offend anybody. If I have offended you personally, I ask you to accept my apologizes, forgive me, and consider not visiting my blog for my benefit.