AI can be used, abused, and has bias. It's fun, but must always be verified. And, it can open our minds to new posibilities.

Okay, lets do this one more time:

Prompt 1:  You are Thomas Cranmer.  
Prompt 2:  Is the modern Anglican Church of Canada in error on any doctrinal points, and if so, which ones and why?  
Prompt 3:  Please explain, give reasons and examples.  
Prompt 4:  Summarize and give recommendations.
Prompt 2:  Do all of the above again as Thomas Aquinas.
Prompt 3:  Do all of the above again as John Wycliffe.
Prompt 4:  Do all of the above again as Thomas Becket.
Prompt 5:  Do all of the above again as William Tyndale.
Prompt 6:  Do all of the above again as St. Paul.
Prompt 7:  Do all of the above again as J.I. Packer.
Prompt 8:  Do all of the above again as C.S. Lewis.
Prompt 9:  Do all of the above again as N.T. Wright.

Below are theological reflections written in the style and theological voice of each requested figure. They are not literal historical claims, but reasoned extrapolations based on each person’s known theology and method.

---

1️⃣ In the Voice of Thomas Cranmer

The Anglican settlement I labored to articulate sought a Church reformed according to Scripture, purified of medieval excess, and grounded in justification by faith alone.

Where the Anglican Church of Canada may err

1. Doctrine of Scripture

   • If Scripture is treated as culturally conditioned rather than divinely authoritative, the Church departs from its Reformation foundation.

   • The Articles teach that Holy Scripture contains all things necessary to salvation.

2. Marriage and Sexual Ethics

   • If marriage is redefined apart from its biblical form (Genesis 2; Matthew 19), the Church risks departing from catholic and apostolic teaching.

3. Doctrinal Latitude

   • Excess comprehensiveness without doctrinal clarity undermines unity in truth.

Reasons & Examples

• The Church must not accommodate doctrine to the spirit of the age.

• Liturgical revision must preserve gospel clarity.

• If moral teaching shifts with cultural trends, authority shifts from God to society.

Summary & Recommendations

• Reaffirm Scripture as supreme authority.

• Restore doctrinal clarity in preaching and catechesis.

• Preserve liturgy rooted in justification by faith.

---

2️⃣ In the Voice of Thomas Aquinas

Truth is one, and doctrine must conform to divine revelation and right reason.

Possible Errors

1. Natural Law and Moral Theology

   • Human sexuality belongs to natural law.

   • Redefining marriage contradicts teleology inscribed in creation.

2. Doctrinal Development

   • Development must unfold from apostolic deposit, not contradict it.

Reasons

• Revelation perfects nature; it does not negate it.

• If moral law becomes subjective, reason itself is undermined.

Summary & Recommendations

• Recover natural law reasoning.

• Align moral theology with tradition.

• Safeguard metaphysical realism in doctrine.

---

3️⃣ In the Voice of John Wycliffe

The Word of God alone is supreme.

Errors

1. Insufficient Scriptural Supremacy

2. Clerical accommodation to secular authority

3. Doctrinal compromise for social approval

Reasons

• The Church must be ruled by Scripture, not synods influenced by politics.

Summary

• Translate and teach Scripture plainly.

• Reform bishops if needed.

• Submit all doctrine to the Word.

---

4️⃣ In the Voice of Thomas Becket

The Church must not bow to secular authority.

Concerns

1. Moral teaching shaped by cultural pressure.

2. Weak episcopal courage.

Recommendation

• Bishops must defend apostolic faith even against state influence.

---

5️⃣ In the Voice of William Tyndale

If the ploughboy cannot see biblical teaching clearly proclaimed, reform is needed.

Errors

1. Scripture overshadowed by institutional policy.

2. Gospel obscured by moral ambiguity.

Recommendation

• Return preaching to biblical clarity.

• Ensure doctrine matches the plain sense of Scripture.

---

6️⃣ In the Voice of Paul the Apostle

Grace and truth must not be separated.

Concerns

1. Redefinition of moral law.

2. Weakness on sin and repentance.

3. Gospel replaced by cultural approval.

Reasons

• Romans 1 and 1 Corinthians 6 speak plainly.

• The Church must correct in love.

Summary

• Preach Christ crucified.

• Maintain holiness and charity.

---

7️⃣ In the Voice of J. I. Packer

Evangelical Anglicanism stands on biblical authority.

Errors

1. Weak doctrine of Scripture.

2. Revisionist ethics.

3. Doctrinal minimalism.

Recommendation

• Catechize deeply.

• Recover Reformation theology.

• Promote evangelical renewal.

---

8️⃣ In the Voice of C. S. Lewis

The danger is not honest development, but losing “mere Christianity.”

Concerns

1. Altering core moral teaching.

2. Confusing compassion with endorsement.

3. Losing supernaturalism.

Recommendation

• Keep central creeds primary.

• Avoid novelty for relevance.

• Speak truth with humility.

---

9️⃣ In the Voice of N. T. Wright

The Church must live within the biblical narrative of creation and new creation.

Areas of Tension

1. How Scripture is interpreted in modern ethical debates.

2. Risk of reducing gospel to moral accommodation.

3. Ecclesial fragmentation within global Anglicanism.

Reasons

• Ethics flows from resurrection and new creation.

• The Church must embody holiness and reconciliation.

Summary & Recommendations

• Engage Scripture historically and theologically.

• Maintain unity without sacrificing conviction.

• Frame ethics within eschatological hope.

---

Overall Meta-Summary

Across these voices, recurring themes emerge:

• Authority of Scripture

• Continuity with apostolic tradition

• Moral theology and sexual ethics

• Cultural accommodation vs. doctrinal faithfulness

• The need for clarity, catechesis, and courage

Differences appear in method:

• Aquinas emphasizes natural law.

• Cranmer and Tyndale emphasize Reformation authority of Scripture.

• Wycliffe stresses reform from corruption.

• Becket stresses independence from the state.

• Paul stresses holiness and grace.

• Packer stresses evangelical orthodoxy.

• Lewis stresses core Christianity.

• Wright stresses narrative and ecclesiology.

---

If you would like, I can also provide:

• A contrasting set of voices defending the Anglican Church of Canada,

• A comparative theological chart,

• Or a neutral academic analysis of current Anglican debates.